🚨 POLL: Should Gen. Flynn Receive A Full Pardon?
Gregg Jarrett, a Fox News legal analyst revealed that explosive new internal FBI documents unsealed Wednesday evening in the government’s case against former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn are the most “outrageous” and “unethical” actions by government officials that he has seen in 40 years of practicing law, according to Fox News.
During an interview with “Fox & Friends” with hosts Steve Doocy, Ainsley Earhardt, and Brian Kilmeade, Jarrett began, “You know, I thought this is the most outrageous, unethical, dishonest, and corrupt act I have ever seen. And, I have been a lawyer for 40 years. I have never seen such misbehavior by government officials.”
“The FBI and prosecutors for Robert Mueller knew that Michael Flynn was an innocent man. They hid the exculpatory evidence. They charged him, coerced him, intimidated and bullied him — threatening to prosecute his son if he didn’t cop a plea,” Jarrett continued. “And so, you know, they covered it all up in a perjury trap that actually failed when the two agents — including Peter Strzok — interviewed General Flynn at the White House. They walked out, went over to the FBI building, sat down, and wrote a report. And, in the report, they said, ‘We don’t think he lied.'”
“So, that invites the question: How in the world do you prosecute a man for lying to the FBI when the FBI agents themselves say he didn’t lie?” he asked. “I mean, that should send a chill down the spine of all Americans.”
Unsealed FBI notes reveal the intent of the FBI’s 1/24/17 interview of Flynn:
“What is our goal? Truth/Admission or to get him to lie, so we can prosecute [Flynn] or get him fired?”
FBI Notes confirm it was all a pretext. pic.twitter.com/Y4IDyE4YZm
— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) April 29, 2020
The documents turned over by the Justice Department (DOJ) reveal hand written notes which FBI openly indicated that their “goal” was “to get [Flynn] to lie, so we can prosecute him or get him fired” during the Mueller probe.
“Well, I agree that Christopher Wray and others at the FBI have known about this for the better part of the last three years,” Jarrett told the “Friends” hosts. “Chris Wray has been the FBI Director for two-and-a-half years. Why didn’t he have the decency to divulge this information? No, Christopher Wray has been covering this up.”
“And, the key line in this one is, ‘What’s our goal? To get him to lie so we can prosecute him or get him fired. Since when is the FBI in the business of getting people fired?” he exclaimed. “That shows you it was all political to damage Donald Trump.”
“But, you know, given all of these exculpatory documents it seems inevitable to me that he must — in the interest of justice — allow Flynn to withdraw his plea…to vacate the plea. And then, the Department of Justice has to dismiss the case against Flynn,” he stated.
Do You Like This Artice? Give Us Feedback 👇
“You know, the moment that happens, I would predict that Flynn would file a lawsuit against not just members of Robert Mueller’s team but people like Comey and McCabe and Peter Strzok and Lisa Page for abuse of power and for, you know, things like obstruction of justice and so forth,” he concluded. “But, you know, they deprived him of his constitutional rights under color of law.”
The handwritten notes — written by the FBI’s former head of counterintelligence Bill Priestap after a meeting with then-FBI Director James Comey and then-FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe show the agents had planned to get Flynn “to admit to breaking the Logan Act” while speaking with the Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak.
More from Fox News:
The Logan Act is an obscure statute that has never been used in a criminal prosecution. Enacted in 1799, it was intended to prevent individuals from falsely claiming to represent the United States abroad.
Although a note indicates that the agents at least discussed the merits of a by-the-book approach, the bombshell materials strongly suggested the agents weren’t truly concerned about Flynn’s intercepted contacts with Kislyak during the presidential transition period, except as a pretext.
Flynn has previously claimed top FBI officials, including McCabe, pressed him not to have an attorney present while he was questioned by two agents. That questioning ultimately led to Flynn’s 2017 guilty plea on a single charge of lying to federal authorities about conversations with Kislyak.
The DOJ turned over the documents just this week, even though a February 2018 standing order in the case from United States District Court for the District of Columbia Emmet Sullivan required the government to turn over any exculpatory materials in its possession that pertained to Flynn. Such materials ordinarily do not need to be disclosed to uncharged individuals or those who have already pleaded guilty, Sullivan has ruled.
— Advertisement —
Flynn has sought to withdraw his guilty plea and has been seeking exoneration, saying the FBI engaged in “egregious misconduct.” Since then, he has obtained new counsel — and his old attorneys, it emerged this week, then failed to turn over thousands of documents to his new lawyer, Sidney Powell. Powell has maintained that Flynn’s old lawyers at Covington & Burling had conflicts of interest and were otherwise ineffective, including by not focusing on Strzok’s evident bias.
Jarrett added that the rest is now up to Sullivan — including whether or not Flynn may alter his plea.